The News & Observer PrintClose Window  


Published: June 4, 2005
Banks and slavery: leveling the playing field

Author: Stella J. Adams; Letter to the Editor

Edition: Final
Section: Opinion
June 4, 2005

As an African-American devoted to increasing access to capital and credit to under-served communities of color, I want to respond to Wachovia's announcement regarding the role of its predecessor banks in slavery (June 2 article "Bank finds slaves in past").

Wachovia conducted an exhaustive and sobering study. It not only looked at its predecessor institutions that owned slaves but also at those institutions that profited indirectly from slavery. We must not forget that America, North and South, profited and prospered directly or indirectly from slavery.

Two banks acquired by Wachovia directly owned slaves, the Bank of Charleston and the Georgia Railroad and Banking Co. A third bank, the Bank of North America, was capitalized by slave traders and human traffickers.

According to the study, 529 slaves were held as collateral on 24 mortgage loans held by the Bank of Charleston. The study lists some of them by name: Julia, Mary and Sam were sold for $45, Celia, Maria, Susan and Eliza sold for $1,000. Quash, Daphney, John, Molly, Jacky and Kate also sold for $1,000. Finally there were "certain Negroes in Texas known as Lavinia and her family" who were used to secure a mortgage on a plantation on Hilton Head Island. The blood, sweat and tears of slaves collateralized much of Hilton Head Island.

The record also shows that at least four slaves died during the construction of the railroad between Augusta and Atlanta. But don't fret for Georgia Railroad and Banking Co., "inasmuch as the negroes have increased in value as they were owned by the company, the value of the four that have died should not be carried to profit & loss."

Wachovia CEO Ken Thompson apologized and has offered "to partner with community organizations that are experts in furthering awareness and education of African-American history, in order to help preserve the African-American experience and incorporate this important piece of our country's history in educational forums."

"We cannot change the past, and we can't make up for the wrongs of slavery," he said. "But we can learn from our past, and begin a stronger dialogue about slavery and the experience of African-Americans in our country."

While I appreciate Thompson's effort, Wachovia can and must do more. It and other lenders with similar histories must reinvest in the communities and the people who have been wronged. Lenders must invest in community economic development projects, support affordable housing and financial literacy.

Wachovia and other lenders with similar histories must recognize that racial wealth disparities are part of their history. Wachovia must take the lead in leveling the playing field for its former slaves. It can invest in black businesses, capitalize a venture capital fund for the development of new technologies at Historically Black Universities and make safe, sound affordable loans available throughout its territory.

Dialogue has its place and is important; the past can not be rewritten; but the future is a blank page. Let's write a future we can all be proud of.

Stella J. Adams

Durham

(The writer is executive director of the N.C. Fair Housing Center, a statewide nonprofit organization. The length limit on letters was waived.)

Copyright 2005 by The News & Observer Pub. Co.
McClatchy Company