Community Reinvestment Association of North Carolina

Advocacy for Change to End Predatory Lending

       Contact Us     Donate

    About Us     Recent News

Home    Media Advocacy    Predatory Lending    Manufactured Housing    Campaigns    Payday Loans
Nuestro Barrio    Richard Brown Show    CRA    Shareholder Advocacy    Credit Cards    Get Involved

High cost loans from major lenders

by race in NC, 2004


 

Why do people use subprime lenders?  Many of the people with subprime loans are in such a predicament because of their greater risk of default.  This is an important assumption.  After all, in today’s risked-based pricing era, borrowers are supposed to pay interest rates that reflect their ability to repay loans.  This system, in theory, should adequately allocate risk. 

 

The system falls down when borrowers have too short of a credit history.  A borrower generally needs a credit history with at least with account that is more than six months old and with a current balance.  Fair Isaac Credit Services, Inc. estimates that 50 million people in the United States cannot meet this hurdle[1].  This group cannot access the kinds of prime credit offered by leading banks.  Some of these borrowers take advantage of loan guarantee programs, community development funds, and other avenues to home ownership.  Nevertheless, many enter into subprime arrangements.

 

When borrowers with good credit pay subprime loans, the risk-based system is not working. 

 

A “high cost loan” is one that, when originated, bears an interest rate more than three percentage points greater than the yield for a treasury bill of similar maturity.  In 2004, the longest term bond was the 20 year bond and as a result it is used as a point of comparison in HMDA analysis.  The yield on a 20 year bond is compared to the APR on a 30 year loan.  HMDA data does not reveal if a loan is adjustable or fixed.  Because fixed rate loans normally carry higher interest rates, many adjustable rate mortgages with higher than normal interest rates may still slip under the “high cost” screen.

 

The following charts show the distribution of high cost loans by race in North Carolina in 2004.  All data comes from records requested by the specific banks.

 

Washington Mutual

North Carolina 2004

Action

high cost

Native

asian

black

islander

white

Grand Total

originate

not high cost

16

70

666

10

3995

4757

 

high cost

6

13

487

2

469

977

 

pct high cost

27.3%

15.7%

42.2%

16.7%

10.5%

17.0%

 

ratio to white

2.60

1.49

4.02

1.59

1.00

 

Washington Mutual: 

§         Blacks are 4.02 times more likely than white borrowers to originate a high cost loan. 

§         42.2 percent of loans to African-Americans are high cost.

 

RBC Centura

North Carolina 2004

Action

High cost

native

asian

black

islander

white

other

Grand Total

originate

not

14

50

416

12

3633

79

4204

 

yes

3

 

79

1

246

24

353

Grand Total

 

17

50

495

13

3879

103

4557

 

pct. High cost

17.6%

0.0%

16.0%

7.7%

6.3%

23.3%

 

 

ratio to white

2.78

0.00

2.52

1.21

1.00

3.67

 

RBC Centura:

§         Blacks are 2.52 times more likely than whites to have a high cost loan.

 

Countrywide

North Carolina 2004

Action

High cost

native

asian

black

islander

white

other

total

originate

not high cost

87

454

1572

34

12756

2393

17296

 

High cost

21

20

548

11

1139

327

2066

total

 

108

474

2120

45

13895

2720

19362

 

pct high cost

19.4%

4.2%

25.8%

24.4%

8.2%

12.0%

10.7%

 

ratio to white

2.37

0.51

3.15

2.98

1.00

1.47

1.30

Countrywide:

§         Blacks are 3.15 times more likely to have high cost loan than are whites.

§         About one-quarter (25.8%) of originations to African-Americans are high cost.

 

Ameriquest

North Carolina 2004

action

high cost

native

asian

black

islander

white

other

Total

originate

not high cost

1

2

30

 

222

211

466

 

high cost

5

6

193

4

650

935

1793

Total

6

8

223

4

872

1146

2259

 

pct high cost

83.3%

75.0%

86.5%

100.0%

74.5%

81.6%

79.4%

 

ratio to white

1.12

1.01

1.16

1.34

1.00

1.09

 

Ameriquest: 

§         Two facts make Ameriquest different: 1) they reject over 83 percent of applications for stick built housing, and 2) of the loans that they accept, 79.4 percent were at high cost rates in North Carolina in 2004.  This is truly subprime lending. 

§         Percent high costs are more equivalent among races at Ameriquest than anywhere else (blacks 1.16 times whites). 

§         Nevertheless, being black seems to hold back wealthy borrowers.  High income (income greater than $60K per year) blacks are only 4 percentage points less likely to have a high cost loan than are low income blacks, whereas high income whites are 20 percentage points less likely to have a high cost loan than are low income whites.

  

Bank of America

North America 2004

Action

high cost

native

asian

black

islander

white

other

 Total

originate

not high cost

157

726

1640

70

13981

1090

17664

 

high cost

 

1

11

 

30